Schoeman, Marsh & Updike, L. L. P. v. Dobi

767 N.E.2d 148, 97 N.Y.2d 721, 740 N.Y.S.2d 691, 2002 N.Y. LEXIS 176
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 14, 2002
StatusPublished

This text of 767 N.E.2d 148 (Schoeman, Marsh & Updike, L. L. P. v. Dobi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schoeman, Marsh & Updike, L. L. P. v. Dobi, 767 N.E.2d 148, 97 N.Y.2d 721, 740 N.Y.S.2d 691, 2002 N.Y. LEXIS 176 (N.Y. 2002).

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the judgment entered pursuant to the parties’ conditional stipulation does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
767 N.E.2d 148, 97 N.Y.2d 721, 740 N.Y.S.2d 691, 2002 N.Y. LEXIS 176, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schoeman-marsh-updike-l-l-p-v-dobi-ny-2002.