Schoelen v. Fidelity and Casualty Co.
This text of 322 So. 2d 780 (Schoelen v. Fidelity and Casualty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
John S. SCHOELEN and Rosemary Fath Schoelen
v.
FIDELITY AND CASUALTY CO.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Writ denied. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, there is no error of law in the judgment conplained of.
TATE, J., dissents in the belief that no reasonable cause is shown for the defendant insurer's excuse of non-payment prior to trial, in view of the indisputable showing of the uninsured motorist's legal liability for the daughter's death.
DIXON, J., is of the opinion that the Court of Appeal was in error and the writ should be granted.
CALOGERO, J., dissents, believing the writ should be granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
322 So. 2d 780, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schoelen-v-fidelity-and-casualty-co-la-1975.