Schock v. Board of Review
This text of 223 A.2d 633 (Schock v. Board of Review) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The opinion of the court was delivered
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Kilkenny for the majority of the Appellate Division. 89 N. J. Super. 118 (App. Div. 1965). See also: Sarja v. Iron Range Resources & Rehabilitation, Minn., 144 N. W. 2d 377 (1966).
The Chief Justice and Justices Jacobs and Proctor dissent and vote to reverse for the reasons expressed in the dissent of Judge Conford in the Appellate Division.
For affirmance — Justices Francis, Hall, Schettino and Haneman — 4.
For reversal — Chief Justice Weintraub and Justices Jacobs and Proctor — 3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
223 A.2d 633, 48 N.J. 121, 1966 N.J. LEXIS 153, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schock-v-board-of-review-nj-1966.