Schober v. Probate Judge

Michigan Supreme Court

Schober v. Probate Judge

1 McGrath 616, 49 McGrath 323

DecidedOctober 18, 1882

StatusPublished

This text of 1 McGrath 616 (Schober v. Probate Judge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schober v. Probate Judge, 1 McGrath 616, 49 McGrath 323 (Mich. 1882).

Pincite

Opinion

To require respondent to entertain relator’s petition for the allowance of the will of one Grabo, under which relator had interests.

[620]*620Granted October 18, 1882.

The will had been allowed by the King’s Court of Wittenberg and petitioner asked that an authenticated copy be allowed .by respondent, under Comp. L., 4342-3. Kespondent claimed that the case was not within these provisions and that he had no jurisdiction, but held, that relator should first proceed under Act 101 of 1881.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

To require respondent to entertain relator’s petition for the allowance of the will of one Grabo, under which relator had interests.

[620]*620Granted October 18, 1882.

The will had been allowed by the King’s Court of Wittenberg and petitioner asked that an authenticated copy be allowed .by respondent, under Comp. L., 4342-3. Kespondent claimed that the case was not within these provisions and that he had no jurisdiction, but held, that relator should first proceed under Act 101 of 1881.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 McGrath 616, 49 McGrath 323, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schober-v-probate-judge-mich-1882.