Schnurr v. State

New York State Court of Claims

Schnurr v. State

195 Misc. 382, 90 N.Y.S.2d 769, 1949 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2485

CourtNew York Court of Claims

DecidedJune 27, 1949

DocketMotion No. 1606

StatusPublished

This text of 195 Misc. 382 (Schnurr v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schnurr v. State, 195 Misc. 382, 90 N.Y.S.2d 769, 1949 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2485 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1949).

Pincite

Opinion

Ryan, J.

This is an application to file a claim pursuant to subdivision 5 of section 10 of Court of Claims Act (L. 1939, ch. 860). On October 31, 1948, the claimant was a passenger in an automobile driven by Betty Jean Koonz which collided with an automobile driven by Leslie Dunn. Dunn filed a notice of inten[383]*383tian on January 27, 1949, and a claim on March 26, 1949. The defendant has had opportunity to investigate the accident and its cause and will not he prejudiced by granting Schnurr permission to file a claim. The excuse which this claimant presents is that he was physically and mentally incapacitated beyond the ninety-day period to the extent that he could not seek or acquire information as to his rights nor act to protect them. In support of this contention he submits his own affidavit and that of his attending physician. It appears that Schnurr sustained a skull fracture and his physician avers that claimant was not at any time during the first three and one-half months following the date on which he sustained such injuries physically or mentally capable of appreciating or understanding his rights or able to discuss them properly or intelligently with an attorney.

That there is here presented an excuse sufficient for the exercise of the court’s discretion is not entirely free from doubt. However, the application is granted upon the authority of Toof v. State of New York (Motion No. 544 [1940], revd. 260 App. Div. 830, affd. 286 N. Y. 620).

Enter order accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ryan, J.

This is an application to file a claim pursuant to subdivision 5 of section 10 of Court of Claims Act (L. 1939, ch. 860). On October 31, 1948, the claimant was a passenger in an automobile driven by Betty Jean Koonz which collided with an automobile driven by Leslie Dunn. Dunn filed a notice of inten[383]*383tian on January 27, 1949, and a claim on March 26, 1949. The defendant has had opportunity to investigate the accident and its cause and will not he prejudiced by granting Schnurr permission to file a claim. The excuse which this claimant presents is that he was physically and mentally incapacitated beyond the ninety-day period to the extent that he could not seek or acquire information as to his rights nor act to protect them. In support of this contention he submits his own affidavit and that of his attending physician. It appears that Schnurr sustained a skull fracture and his physician avers that claimant was not at any time during the first three and one-half months following the date on which he sustained such injuries physically or mentally capable of appreciating or understanding his rights or able to discuss them properly or intelligently with an attorney.

That there is here presented an excuse sufficient for the exercise of the court’s discretion is not entirely free from doubt. However, the application is granted upon the authority of Toof v. State of New York (Motion No. 544 [1940], revd. 260 App. Div. 830, affd. 286 N. Y. 620).

Enter order accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

195 Misc. 382, 90 N.Y.S.2d 769, 1949 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2485, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schnurr-v-state-nyclaimsct-1949.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack