Schnuck Markets, Inc. v. Puller

Missouri Court of Appeals

Schnuck Markets, Inc. v. Puller

864 S.W.2d 433, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1729, 1993 WL 453617

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 9, 1993·No. No. 63124·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Schnucks appeals the trial court’s ruling denying its claim for unjust enrichment against Puller for $7,632. We affirm.

We find the trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. Rule 84.16(b)(1). Further, we find no error of law appears. Rule 84.16(b)(5).

Further, we find an opinion in this case would have no precedential value and affirm by "written order. A memorandum for the parties’ use only has been prepared.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Schnucks appeals the trial court’s ruling denying its claim for unjust enrichment against Puller for $7,632. We affirm.

We find the trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. Rule 84.16(b)(1). Further, we find no error of law appears. Rule 84.16(b)(5).

Further, we find an opinion in this case would have no precedential value and affirm by "written order. A memorandum for the parties’ use only has been prepared.

Schnuck Markets, Inc. v. Puller, 864 S.W.2d 433, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1729, 1993 WL 453617 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

864 S.W.2d 433 (Schnuck Markets, Inc. v. Puller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.