Schnoedewind v. Clark

11 F.R.D. 106, 1950 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3563
CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedOctober 19, 1950
DocketCiv. No. 33-115
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 11 F.R.D. 106 (Schnoedewind v. Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schnoedewind v. Clark, 11 F.R.D. 106, 1950 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3563 (S.D.N.Y. 1950).

Opinion

CONGER, Judge.

Motion by the defendant to dismiss this action on the ground that it has abated for the reason that the defendant Tom C. Clark, Attorney General of the United States as successor to the Alien Property Custodian, resigned from office on August 24, 1949, and on the same day was succeeded in office by J. Howard McGrath; that plaintiffs have not substituted the said J. Howard McGrath as defendant herein in the place and stead of defendant Tom C. Clark within six months after the said Mc-Grath took office, as required by Rule 25 (d), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A.

On August 24, 1949 Tom C. Clark resigned as Attorney General of the United', States and was succeeded in office on the same date by J. Howard McGrath. No motion was ever made to- substitute Mr. Mc-Grath for Mr. Clark and the six months’ period within which substitution could have been made expired on February 24, 1950.

[107]*107Since Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure has not been complied with this motion must be granted. Buck v. Snyder, 85 U.S.App. D.C. 428, 179 F.2d 466; Bowles v. Wilke, 7 Cir., 175 F.2d 35; Bowles v. Ohlhausen, D.C., 71 F.Supp. 199; Becker Steel Co. of America v. Hicks, 2 Cir., 66 F.2d 497; Kuttroff v. Sutherland, 2 Cir., 66 F.2d 500.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Toshio Joji v. Clark
11 F.R.D. 253 (N.D. California, 1951)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 F.R.D. 106, 1950 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3563, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schnoedewind-v-clark-nysd-1950.