Schnitzler v. Oriental Metal Bed Co.

93 N.Y.S. 1118
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided May 23, 1905·Published

Opinion

SCOTT, P. J.

Appeal from judgment. The case for plaintiff rested solely upon her own evidence, uncorroborated by any one, and contradicted by a number of witnesses, some of them apparently disinterested. Her own story is full of contradictions, some, but [1119]*1119not all, of which may be accounted for by her ignorance. In our opinion, the weight of the evidence rested with defendant, and, while it was proper enough to submit the case to the jury (McDonald v. Met. St. Ry. Co., 167 N. Y. 66, 60 N. E. 282), still we think that the verdict should have been set aside and a new trial granted. Clearly the plaintiff did not sustain the burden of proof.

Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schnitzler v. Oriental Metal Bed Co., 93 N.Y.S. 1118 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).

93 N.Y.S. 1118 (Schnitzler v. Oriental Metal Bed Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McDonald v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.
60 N.E. 282 (New York Court of Appeals, 1901)