Schnitzius v. Fisher Paper Box Co.

121 N.W. 1134, 108 Minn. 522, 1909 Minn. LEXIS 751
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedMay 28, 1909
DocketNos. 16,097—(116)
StatusPublished

This text of 121 N.W. 1134 (Schnitzius v. Fisher Paper Box Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schnitzius v. Fisher Paper Box Co., 121 N.W. 1134, 108 Minn. 522, 1909 Minn. LEXIS 751 (Mich. 1909).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Action for personal injuries, in which, after plaintiff had rested her case, the court directed a verdict for defendant, and plaintiff appealed from an order denying a new trial. A careful examination of the record discloses no evidence of negligence on the part of defendant, and the action of the court below was therefore proper. A discussion of the evidence would serve no useful purpose as a precedent, and we content ourselves with the statement that it has been fully considered with the result stated. The rule of res ipsa loquitur has no application to the facts presented.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
121 N.W. 1134, 108 Minn. 522, 1909 Minn. LEXIS 751, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schnitzius-v-fisher-paper-box-co-minn-1909.