Schnitz v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Schnitz v. State

666 N.E.2d 919, 1996 Ind. LEXIS 64, 1996 WL 368839

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedJune 25, 1996

DocketNo. 34S02-9507-CR-899

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 666 N.E.2d 919 (Schnitz v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schnitz v. State, 666 N.E.2d 919, 1996 Ind. LEXIS 64, 1996 WL 368839 (Ind. 1996).

Pincite

Opinions

SHEPARD, Chief Justice.

The Court of Appeals held in this appeal that the State need not prove that a cocaine dealer knew that he committed his crime within 1000 feet of a school in order to convict the dealer of dealing in cocaine as a class A felony, Ind.Code Ann. § 35-48-4-1 (West Supp.1990). Schnitz v. State, 650 N.E.2d 717 (Ind.Ct.App.1995). We granted transfer to consider this question alongside the appeal in Walker v. State, 668 N.E.2d 243 (Ind.1996).

For the reasons explained in Walker v. State, we summarily affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals in this ease. Ind. Appellate Rule 11(B)(3).

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

DICKSON and SELBY, JJ., concur. DeBRULER, J., dissents without separate opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI