Schnibbe v. Hauck Manufacturing Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Schnibbe v. Hauck Manufacturing Co.

168 A.D. 932, 152 N.Y.S. 1142

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 15, 1915

StatusPublished

This text of 168 A.D. 932 (Schnibbe v. Hauck Manufacturing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schnibbe v. Hauck Manufacturing Co., 168 A.D. 932, 152 N.Y.S. 1142 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

It is decided (1) that the reply did not deny that plaintiff knew the stock was transferred to plaintiff by Gutkes while insolvent and in fraud of his creditors, without consideration, and that the first counterclaim was admitted and that defendant could move to dismiss the complaint at the commencement of the trial; (2) that if the reply was defective as to the second counterclaim, it should have been attacked before the trial; (3) that it does not appear that plaintiff had actual knowledge that the tax had not been paid and that such knowledge is not imputed to him. Hence the reply to-that counterclaim was sufficient. [933]*933Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the final award of costs. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Stapleton and Rich, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

It is decided (1) that the reply did not deny that plaintiff knew the stock was transferred to plaintiff by Gutkes while insolvent and in fraud of his creditors, without consideration, and that the first counterclaim was admitted and that defendant could move to dismiss the complaint at the commencement of the trial; (2) that if the reply was defective as to the second counterclaim, it should have been attacked before the trial; (3) that it does not appear that plaintiff had actual knowledge that the tax had not been paid and that such knowledge is not imputed to him. Hence the reply to-that counterclaim was sufficient. [933]*933Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the final award of costs. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Stapleton and Rich, JJ., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

168 A.D. 932, 152 N.Y.S. 1142, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schnibbe-v-hauck-manufacturing-co-nyappdiv-1915.