Schnibbe v. Glenz
219 A.D. 793
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 15, 1927
StatusPublished
This text of 219 A.D. 793 (Schnibbe v. Glenz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Schnibbe v. Glenz, 219 A.D. 793 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1927).
Opinion
Order and judgment entered thereon affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Kelly, P. J., Manning, Kapper and Lazansky, JJ., concur; Young, J., dissents upon the ground that the acts complained of did not constitute a violation of the covenant referred to. (Smith v. Graham, 217 N. Y. 655.) Settle order on notice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Smith v. . Graham
112 N.E. 1076 (New York Court of Appeals, 1916)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
219 A.D. 793, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schnibbe-v-glenz-nyappdiv-1927.