Schnertzell v. Young

General Court of Virginia

Schnertzell v. Young

3 Md. 502

General Court of Virginia·Decided October 15, 1796·Published

Opinion

The defendant objected to this paper being read to the jury, it being not legal evidence. But the court overruled the objection, and adjudged the said paper to be proper and legal evidence.

The general court reversed the judgment of the county court, upon the ground that the clerk of the council was not an officer competent by law to authenticate copies.

A procedendo was awarded, and the record remitted to the county court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant objected to this paper being read to the jury, it being not legal evidence. But the court overruled the objection, and adjudged the said paper to be proper and legal evidence.

The general court reversed the judgment of the county court, upon the ground that the clerk of the council was not an officer competent by law to authenticate copies.

A procedendo was awarded, and the record remitted to the county court.

Schnertzell v. Young, 3 Md. 502 (Va. Super. Ct. 1796).

Pincite

3 Md. 502 (Schnertzell v. Young) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.