Schnertzell v. Young
This text of 3 Md. 502 (Schnertzell v. Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering General Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant objected to this paper being read to the jury, it being not legal evidence. But the court overruled the objection, and adjudged the said paper to be proper and legal evidence.
The general court reversed the judgment of the county court, upon the ground that the clerk of the council was not an officer competent by law to authenticate copies.
A procedendo was awarded, and the record remitted to the county court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 Md. 502, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schnertzell-v-young-vagensess-1796.