Schnerr v. the Superior Ct. of City Cty., S.F.

295 P. 97, 111 Cal. App. 136, 1931 Cal. App. LEXIS 1242
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedJanuary 16, 1931
DocketDocket No. 7848.
StatusPublished

This text of 295 P. 97 (Schnerr v. the Superior Ct. of City Cty., S.F.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schnerr v. the Superior Ct. of City Cty., S.F., 295 P. 97, 111 Cal. App. 136, 1931 Cal. App. LEXIS 1242 (Cal. Ct. App. 1931).

Opinion

THE COURT.

[1] The application is denied for the reason that petitioner has ample remedy by appeal. (Helbush v.Superior Court, 99 Cal.App. 501 [278 P. 1062].)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Helbush v. Superior Court
278 P. 1062 (California Court of Appeal, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
295 P. 97, 111 Cal. App. 136, 1931 Cal. App. LEXIS 1242, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schnerr-v-the-superior-ct-of-city-cty-sf-calctapp-1931.