Schneller v. Vincent

Washington Supreme Court

Schneller v. Vincent

237 P. 1119, 135 Wash. 698

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Schneller v. Vincent. Read the opinion of the Court — 131 Wash. 238 →

Washington Supreme Court·Decided July 2, 1925·No. No. 18653. En Banc.·Published

Opinion

On Rehearing.

Per Curiam.

— The majority of the court is satisfied, upon the argument' En Banc, with the result announced in the Departmental decision, Schneller v. Vincent, 131 Wash. 238, 229 Pac. 737, although there may he some question aá to whether the facts establish an agreement on the part of the respondent to pay the appellant the balance due on the mortgage.

The judgment is therefore reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On Rehearing.

Per Curiam.

— The majority of the court is satisfied, upon the argument' En Banc, with the result announced in the Departmental decision, Schneller v. Vincent, 131 Wash. 238, 229 Pac. 737, although there may he some question aá to whether the facts establish an agreement on the part of the respondent to pay the appellant the balance due on the mortgage.

The judgment is therefore reversed.

Schneller v. Vincent, 237 P. 1119, 135 Wash. 698 (Wash. 1925).

Pincite

237 P. 1119 (Schneller v. Vincent) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related