Schnell v. Township of Millburn
328 A.2d 624, 66 N.J. 137, 1974 N.J. LEXIS 145
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division. 127 N. J. Super. 155.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Hughes, Justices Jacobs, Mountain, Sullivan, Pashman and Clieeoed and Judge COLLESTEE-7.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Schnell v. Township of Millburn, 328 A.2d 624, 66 N.J. 137, 1974 N.J. LEXIS 145 (N.J. 1974).
328 A.2d 624 (Schnell v. Township of Millburn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services
9 A.3d 882 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2010)
N.E.R.I. Corp. v. New Jersey Highway Authority
686 A.2d 328 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1996)
National Waste Recycling, Inc. v. Middlesex County Improvement Authority
677 A.2d 268 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1996)
Gross v. Township of Ocean
445 A.2d 435 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1982)
Pied Piper Ice Cream, Inc. v. Essex Cty. Park Comm.
334 A.2d 337 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1975)