Schnell v. Thornton

391 P.2d 380, 237 Or. 253, 1964 Ore. LEXIS 344
CourtOregon Supreme Court
DecidedApril 15, 1964
StatusPublished

This text of 391 P.2d 380 (Schnell v. Thornton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schnell v. Thornton, 391 P.2d 380, 237 Or. 253, 1964 Ore. LEXIS 344 (Or. 1964).

Opinions

MoALLISTER, C. J.

The petitioners, pursuant to ORS 254.080, have asked this court to correct the ballot title prepared by the Attorney General for an initiative measure filed with the Secretary of State.

On January 28,1964 the Attorney General returned to the Secretary of State the following ballot title:

BALLOT TITLE
uAmending State Workmen's Compensation Law. Purpose: Expands Workmen’s Compensation Law to cover practically all employed persons. Increases accident benefits approximately 18 per cent. Requires employers to insure under compulsory state compensation system.”

Petitioners contend that the ballot title returned by the Attorney General is insufficient, unfair, and does not intelligibly express the chief purpose of the measure as required by ORS 254.070.1

It is apparent that the chief purpose of the measure is to change the Workmen’s Compensation Law from an elective to a compulsory state system. The measure requires all employers, except those specifically exempted, to insure under the state compensation system.

The Attorney General concedes that the chief pur[255]*255pose of the measure is to change the Workmen’s Compensation Law from an elective to a compulsory state system. In his brief the Attorney General states: “The proposed law simply changes Oregon from an elective state fund to a compulsory state fund class.” The appellants’ brief also states that the measure would “change the current ‘elective’ type to a ‘compulsory’ compensation system.”

We agree that the Attorney General’s ballot title is defective in that it does not state with clarity the chief purpose of the measure. In addition, the chief purpose seems to be subordinated to the secondary purposes of expanding the coverage and increasing the benefits. We, therefore, certify to the Secretary of State a ballot title for the measure in question reading as follows:

BALLOT TITLE
“Amending State Workmen’s Compensation Law. Purpose: Changes Workmen’s Compensation Law from an elective to a compulsory state system. Bequires employers to insure under state system. Includes practically all employees. Increases benefits.”

Ballot title revised.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 254.080
Oregon § 254.080
§ 254.070
Oregon § 254.070

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
391 P.2d 380, 237 Or. 253, 1964 Ore. LEXIS 344, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schnell-v-thornton-or-1964.