Schneidman v. Dow Chemical Co.

Third Circuit

Schneidman v. Dow Chemical Co.

857 F.2d 1465, 1988 WL 91922

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedAugust 5, 1988

Docket88-1157_1

StatusPublished

This text of 857 F.2d 1465 (Schneidman v. Dow Chemical Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schneidman v. Dow Chemical Co., 857 F.2d 1465, 1988 WL 91922 (3d Cir. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

857 F.2d 1465

Schneidman (Janice), by Schneidman (Dorothy, Samuel)
v.
Dow Chemical Company, Pittman Moore Company, E.R. Quibb and
Sons, Inc., E.R. Squibb and Sons, Olin Corporation,
Merrell-Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., National Drug Company,
Merck and Co., Sharpe and Dhome, Inc., Merck, Sharpe and
Dhome, Miles Laboratories, Inc., Cutter Laboratories, Warner
Lampert Company, Eli Lilly and Company

NO. 88-1157

United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.

AUG 05, 1988

Appeal From: E.D.Pa.,

Newcomer, J.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI