Schneider v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Schneider v. State

557 S.W.3d 538

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 2, 2018

DocketNo. ED 105413

StatusPublished

This text of 557 S.W.3d 538 (Schneider v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schneider v. State, 557 S.W.3d 538 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

*539Raymond Schneider ("Movant") appeals the motion court's judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction and finding that Movant failed to demonstrate that his trial counsel was ineffective. Finding that the motion court did not clearly err in denying Movant's Rule 29.15 motion, we affirm the judgment of the motion court.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, we have provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

*539Raymond Schneider ("Movant") appeals the motion court's judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction and finding that Movant failed to demonstrate that his trial counsel was ineffective. Finding that the motion court did not clearly err in denying Movant's Rule 29.15 motion, we affirm the judgment of the motion court.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, we have provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

557 S.W.3d 538, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schneider-v-state-moctapp-2018.