Schneider v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Schneider v. State

60 So. 3d 556, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 6424, 2011 WL 1705571

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 6, 2011·No. No. 5D10-4·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See generally Jackson v. State, 979 So.2d 1158 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008) (explaining that evidence may be authenticated by appearance, content, substance, internal patterns, or other distinctive characteristics taken in conjunction with circumstances;, in addition, evidence may be authenticated either by using extrinsic evidence, or by showing that it meets requirements for self-authentication).

MONACO, C.J., SAWAYA and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See generally Jackson v. State, 979 So.2d 1158 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008) (explaining that evidence may be authenticated by appearance, content, substance, internal patterns, or other distinctive characteristics taken in conjunction with circumstances;, in addition, evidence may be authenticated either by using extrinsic evidence, or by showing that it meets requirements for self-authentication).

MONACO, C.J., SAWAYA and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.

Schneider v. State, 60 So. 3d 556, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 6424, 2011 WL 1705571 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

60 So. 3d 556 (Schneider v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related