Schneider v. Schneider

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Schneider v. Schneider

159 A.D.2d 501, 553 N.Y.S.2d 273, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2531

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Schneider v. Schneider. Read the opinion of the Court — 156 A.D.2d 439 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 5, 1990·Published

Opinion

Motion by the plaintiff to amend the decision and order of this court dated December 11, 1989 [156 AD2d 439], which determined an appeal from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Friedenberg, J.), entered December 28, 1987, as amended March 1, 1988, as, after a nonjury trial, awarded the plaintiff wife $13,764 for necessaries, $5,618.56 for arrears in pendente lite maintenance and child support, $300 per week ($150 per week per child) in child support, and $16,832.20 in counsel fees, to provide that costs are awarded to her.

Upon the papers submitted in support of the motion and the papers submitted in opposition thereto, it is,

Ordered that the motion is granted; and it is further,

Ordered that the decision and order of this court dated December 11, 1989, is amended, by adding, after the words "one bill of costs” the words "to the plaintiff”. Thompson, J. P., Fiber, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion by the plaintiff to amend the decision and order of this court dated December 11, 1989 [156 AD2d 439], which determined an appeal from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Friedenberg, J.), entered December 28, 1987, as amended March 1, 1988, as, after a nonjury trial, awarded the plaintiff wife $13,764 for necessaries, $5,618.56 for arrears in pendente lite maintenance and child support, $300 per week ($150 per week per child) in child support, and $16,832.20 in counsel fees, to provide that costs are awarded to her.

Upon the papers submitted in support of the motion and the papers submitted in opposition thereto, it is,

Ordered that the motion is granted; and it is further,

Ordered that the decision and order of this court dated December 11, 1989, is amended, by adding, after the words "one bill of costs” the words "to the plaintiff”. Thompson, J. P., Fiber, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Schneider v. Schneider, 159 A.D.2d 501, 553 N.Y.S.2d 273, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2531 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

159 A.D.2d 501 (Schneider v. Schneider) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.