Schneider v. Schneider

238 A.D. 792
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 15, 1933·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Order and judgment unanimously affirmed. The findings of fact in the decision supporting the judgment of September 23, 1930, were all essential. They were based on issues tendered by the plaintiff’s own pleadings and proof. The scope of those findings was not lessened by the affirmance of them by this court in connection with an opinion that indicated in some respects narrower reasons for such affirmance. [See 232 App. Div. 71.] If it were deemed important that these findings should be narrowed, an appropriate request for such relief should have been made, and, if improvidently denied, further relief by appeal was available to the plaintiff. [793]*793Plaintiff did not pursue that remedy and, therefore, she may not again litigate the same questions through the medium of her first, second and third defenses in her amended reply. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Carswell, Seudder and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schneider v. Schneider, 238 A.D. 792 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

238 A.D. 792 (Schneider v. Schneider) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Di Russo v. Di Russo
55 Misc. 2d 839 (New York Supreme Court, 1968)
Harges v. Harges
46 Misc. 2d 994 (New York Supreme Court, 1965)
Bane v. Bane
196 Misc. 318 (New York Supreme Court, 1948)
Shea v. Shea
270 A.D. 527 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1946)