Schneider v. May

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Schneider v. May

231 A.D. 744

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1930

StatusPublished

This text of 231 A.D. 744 (Schneider v. May) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schneider v. May, 231 A.D. 744 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion to extend plaintiff’s time to reply to counterclaim granted and time extended until ten days after entry of the order made upon the decision of the appeal upon condition that appellant perfect- the appeal for Friday, November fourteenth (for which day the case is set down), and be ready for argument when reached; otherwise, motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion to extend plaintiff’s time to reply to counterclaim granted and time extended until ten days after entry of the order made upon the decision of the appeal upon condition that appellant perfect- the appeal for Friday, November fourteenth (for which day the case is set down), and be ready for argument when reached; otherwise, motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

231 A.D. 744, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schneider-v-may-nyappdiv-1930.