Schneider v. Jp Morgan Chase Bank, National Association

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia
DecidedJanuary 23, 2014
DocketCivil Action No. 2014-1047
StatusPublished

This text of Schneider v. Jp Morgan Chase Bank, National Association (Schneider v. Jp Morgan Chase Bank, National Association) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schneider v. Jp Morgan Chase Bank, National Association, (D.D.C. 2014).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA

United States of America, The States of California, ) C/A: 3:13-1223-JFA Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, ) Indiana, Iowa, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Montana, ) Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, ) ORDER North Carolina, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Virginia, ) and the District of Columbia, ex rel. Laurence ) Schneider, ) ) Plaintiffs/Relator, ) v. ) ) J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, National Association, J.P. ) Morgan Chase & Company, and Chase Home ) Finance, L.L.C., ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________ )

The United States having declined to intervene in this action pursuant to the False Claims

Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3730(b)(4)(B), the Court rules as follows:

IT IS ORDERED that,

1. The complaint be unsealed and served upon the defendants by the relator within 21

days of the date of this order;

2. The entire docket in this action and all documents that have been filed in it shall be

unsealed, provided, however, that this ruling is STAYED for thirty days following the entry of this

order.1 The Clerk is directed NOT TO UNSEAL any other documents in this case until further order

of this court. During the thirty day stay, any interested party may note a proper appeal of this Order,

or may file a motion for reconsideration of this Order;

1 The court finds persuasive the analysis provided by the court in United States v. King Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 806 F.Supp.2d 833 (D.Md. 2011).

1 3. The seal be lifted as to all other matters occurring in this action after the date of this

Order;

4. The parties shall serve all pleadings and motions filed in this action, including

supporting memoranda, upon the United States, as provided for in 31 U.S.C. 3730(c)(3). The United

States may order any deposition transcripts and is entitled to intervene in this action, for good cause,

at any time;

5. The parties shall serve all notices of appeal upon the United States;

6. All orders of this Court shall be sent to the United States; and that

7. Should the relator or the defendants propose that this action be dismissed, settled, or

otherwise discontinued, the Court will solicit the written consent of the United States before ruling

or granting its approval.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

January 22, January 23, 2014 2014 Joseph F. Anderson, Jr. Columbia, South Carolina United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Schneider v. Jp Morgan Chase Bank, National Association, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schneider-v-jp-morgan-chase-bank-national-associat-dcd-2014.