Schneider Granite Co. v. Gast Realty & Investment Co.

168 S.W. 692, 259 Mo. 172, 1914 Mo. LEXIS 65
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Schneider Granite Co. v. Gast Realty & Investment Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 259 Mo. 153
Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided June 23, 1914·Published

Opinion

WILLIAMS, C.

The controlling facts of this case are in every particular substantially the same as those involved in the case of The Schneider Granite Company v. Gast Eealty & Investment Company and Emily Gast, decided by Division Two of this court at the present term and reported at page 153, ante. The conclusions reached in that ease are controlling in this and for the reasons therein stated it is ordered that the judgment in the present case he affirmed.

Boy, C., concurs.

PEE CUEIAM. — The foregoing opinion of Williams, C., is adopted as the opinion of the court.

All the judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schneider Granite Co. v. Gast Realty & Investment Co., 168 S.W. 692, 259 Mo. 172, 1914 Mo. LEXIS 65 (Mo. 1914).

168 S.W. 692 (Schneider Granite Co. v. Gast Realty & Investment Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.