Schneider Bros. & Co. v. United States

39 Cust. Ct. 528
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Schneider Bros. & Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 39 Cust. Ct. 515
United States Customs Court·Decided November 14, 1957·No. V. D. 50; Entry Nos. 82454; 94457·Published

Opinion

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This matter is before me on remand from classification proceedings decided by the first division of this court in Schneider Bros. & Co., Inc. v. United States, 37 Cust. Ct. 348, Abstract 60198. The conclusion therein, and the judgment issued pursuant thereto, was to the effect that the protests had been prematurely filed and the matter was remanded to a single judge in reappraisement to determine the proper dutiable values in the manner provided by law. (28 U. S. C. § 2636 (d).)

[529]*529A stipulation of submission, upon which the matter is now before me, establishes export value, as defined in' section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for appraisement of the microscopes and the wooden cases in question, and that such dutiable value for each of the classes of articles is as set forth in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, and I so hold. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schneider Bros. & Co. v. United States, 39 Cust. Ct. 528 (cusc 1957).

39 Cust. Ct. 528 (Schneider Bros. & Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Schneider Bros. v. United States
37 Cust. Ct. 348 (U.S. Customs Court, 1956)