Schneider Bros. & Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Schneider Bros. & Co. v. United States

32 Cust. Ct. 381, 1954 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1768

United States Customs Court·Decided January 26, 1954·No. No. 57787; protest 165085-K (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the kidskins plates are similar in all material respects to those the subject of Kung Chen Fur Corpn. v. United States (29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained. . .

Ford, J., concurred. Mollison, J., dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in C. D. 1480, supra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the kidskins plates are similar in all material respects to those the subject of Kung Chen Fur Corpn. v. United States (29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained. . .

Ford, J., concurred. Mollison, J., dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in C. D. 1480, supra.

Schneider Bros. & Co. v. United States, 32 Cust. Ct. 381, 1954 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1768 (cusc 1954).

Pincite

32 Cust. Ct. 381 (Schneider Bros. & Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related