Schnee v. Schnee

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Schnee v. Schnee

127 A.D.2d 581, 511 N.Y.S.2d 548, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 43051

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Schnee v. Schnee. Read the opinion of the Court — 152 A.D.2d 665 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 2, 1987·Published

Opinion

In an action for a divorce [582]*582and ancillary relief, the defendant husband appeals from such much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Widlitz, J.), dated December 11, 1985, as amended December 13, 1985, as directed him to pay the plaintiff wife $350 per week in maintenance, all the carrying charges on the marital residence and a Florida condominium, including utilities, $5,000 in counsel fees and $2,500 for accountant’s fees, and denied his cross motion for leave to sell the Florida condominium, and the plaintiff wife cross-appeals, on the ground of inadequacy, from so much of the order as awarded her maintenance, counsel fees, and expert fees.

Ordered that the order, as amended, is affirmed, insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Special Term did not commit error or abuse its discretion in its award of pendente lite relief. Thompson, J. P., Niehoff, Weinstein, Kunzeman and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for a divorce [582]*582and ancillary relief, the defendant husband appeals from such much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Widlitz, J.), dated December 11, 1985, as amended December 13, 1985, as directed him to pay the plaintiff wife $350 per week in maintenance, all the carrying charges on the marital residence and a Florida condominium, including utilities, $5,000 in counsel fees and $2,500 for accountant’s fees, and denied his cross motion for leave to sell the Florida condominium, and the plaintiff wife cross-appeals, on the ground of inadequacy, from so much of the order as awarded her maintenance, counsel fees, and expert fees.

Ordered that the order, as amended, is affirmed, insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Special Term did not commit error or abuse its discretion in its award of pendente lite relief. Thompson, J. P., Niehoff, Weinstein, Kunzeman and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Schnee v. Schnee, 127 A.D.2d 581, 511 N.Y.S.2d 548, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 43051 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

127 A.D.2d 581 (Schnee v. Schnee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.