Schneckloth v. Bustamonte
405 U.S. 1062, 92 S. Ct. 1491
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Schneckloth v. Bustamonte. Read the opinion of the Court — 412 U.S. 218 →
Opinion
C. A. 9th Cir. [Certiorari granted, ante, p. 953.] Motion of respondent for appointment of counsel granted. It is ordered that Stuart P. Tobisman, Esquire, of Los Angeles, California, be, and he is hereby, appointed to serve as counsel for respondent pro hac vice in this case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 405 U.S. 1062, 92 S. Ct. 1491 (1972).
405 U.S. 1062 (Schneckloth v. Bustamonte) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.