Schneck v. Ketcham
228 A.D. 774
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 15, 1930·Published
Opinion
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Dowling, P. J., Merrell, Finch, McAvoy and O’Malley, JJ.; Finch, J., dissents and votes for reversal on the authority of Cuban Tel. Co. v. Conklin (196 App. Div. 463).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Schneck v. Ketcham, 228 A.D. 774 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).
228 A.D. 774 (Schneck v. Ketcham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cuban Telephone Co. v. Conklin
196 A.D. 463 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1921)