Schneble v. Florida

Supreme Court

Schneble v. Florida

392 U.S. 298

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided June 10, 1968·No. 1070, Misc·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123. See Roberts v. Russell, ante, p. 293.

Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice White dissent for the reasons stated in Mr. Justice White’s dissenting opinion in Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123, 138 (1968).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The motion to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123. See Roberts v. Russell, ante, p. 293.

Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice White dissent for the reasons stated in Mr. Justice White’s dissenting opinion in Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123, 138 (1968).

Schneble v. Florida, 392 U.S. 298 (1968).

Pincite

392 U.S. 298 (Schneble v. Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related