Schneble v. Florida

Supreme Court

Schneble v. Florida

392 U.S. 298

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedJune 10, 1968

Docket1070, Misc

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 392 U.S. 298 (Schneble v. Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schneble v. Florida, 392 U.S. 298 (1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123. See Roberts v. Russell, ante, p. 293.

Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice White dissent for the reasons stated in Mr. Justice White’s dissenting opinion in Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123, 138 (1968).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The motion to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123. See Roberts v. Russell, ante, p. 293.

Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice White dissent for the reasons stated in Mr. Justice White’s dissenting opinion in Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123, 138 (1968).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

392 U.S. 298, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schneble-v-florida-scotus-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack