Schnall v. Hill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Schnall v. Hill

251 A.D. 724, 297 N.Y.S. 439

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 7, 1937·Published

Opinion

In a proceeding instituted to procure a peremptory or an alternative mandamus order against the respondent, a justice of the peace of the town of Eastehester, county of Westchester, order denying petitioner’s motion for a peremptory or an alternative order of mandamus affirmed, with costs, as a matter of law and not in the exercise of discretion. No opinion. Carswell, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., not voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding instituted to procure a peremptory or an alternative mandamus order against the respondent, a justice of the peace of the town of Eastehester, county of Westchester, order denying petitioner’s motion for a peremptory or an alternative order of mandamus affirmed, with costs, as a matter of law and not in the exercise of discretion. No opinion. Carswell, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., not voting.

Schnall v. Hill, 251 A.D. 724, 297 N.Y.S. 439 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

251 A.D. 724 (Schnall v. Hill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.