Schnall v. Hill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Schnall v. Hill

251 A.D. 724, 297 N.Y.S. 439

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 7, 1937

StatusPublished

This text of 251 A.D. 724 (Schnall v. Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schnall v. Hill, 251 A.D. 724, 297 N.Y.S. 439 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding instituted to procure a peremptory or an alternative mandamus order against the respondent, a justice of the peace of the town of Eastehester, county of Westchester, order denying petitioner’s motion for a peremptory or an alternative order of mandamus affirmed, with costs, as a matter of law and not in the exercise of discretion. No opinion. Carswell, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., not voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding instituted to procure a peremptory or an alternative mandamus order against the respondent, a justice of the peace of the town of Eastehester, county of Westchester, order denying petitioner’s motion for a peremptory or an alternative order of mandamus affirmed, with costs, as a matter of law and not in the exercise of discretion. No opinion. Carswell, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., not voting.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

251 A.D. 724, 297 N.Y.S. 439, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schnall-v-hill-nyappdiv-1937.