Schnadig v. Flescher
This text of 29 F. 465 (Schnadig v. Flescher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The motion to remand is sustained on the authority of Gibson v. Bruce, 308 U. S. 561, S. C. 2 Sup. Ct. Rep. 873, and Frelinghuysen v. Baldwin, 19 Fed. Rep. 49. The first case is an authoritative declaration that, under the removal act of 1875, the requisito citizenship must exist, both at the time of commencing the suit and also at the time of filing the petition for removal. The language of the act of 1867 is not identical with that of the act of 1875, but the difference is not such as to indicate a different intent on the part of congress. See the opinion of Circuit Judge Wallace in the second case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
29 F. 465, 1887 U.S. App. LEXIS 2374, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schnadig-v-flescher-circtdco-1887.