Schnabel v. Tyler

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Schnabel v. Tyler

632 A.2d 708, 227 Conn. 932, 1993 Conn. LEXIS 375

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedOctober 15, 1993

DocketSC 14853

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 632 A.2d 708 (Schnabel v. Tyler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schnabel v. Tyler, 632 A.2d 708, 227 Conn. 932, 1993 Conn. LEXIS 375 (Colo. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 32 Conn. App. 704 (AC 10937), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court had been correct in ruling that the qualified immunity defense under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 was not available to the plaintiff?

“2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court had correctly excluded the evidence [933]*933offered by the plaintiff on the issue of the plaintiffs qualified immunity under 42 U.S.C. § 1983?”

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 14853. Decided October 15, 1993 Elliot B. Spector, in support of the petition. Kathleen Eldergill, in opposition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 32 Conn. App. 704 (AC 10937), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court had been correct in ruling that the qualified immunity defense under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 was not available to the plaintiff?

“2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court had correctly excluded the evidence [933]*933offered by the plaintiff on the issue of the plaintiffs qualified immunity under 42 U.S.C. § 1983?”

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 14853. Decided October 15, 1993 Elliot B. Spector, in support of the petition. Kathleen Eldergill, in opposition.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

632 A.2d 708, 227 Conn. 932, 1993 Conn. LEXIS 375, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schnabel-v-tyler-conn-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack