Schmuck v. Dakota Southern Railway Co.
This text of 27 N.W.2d 245 (Schmuck v. Dakota Southern Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering South Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff sought to appeal from an order vacating a default judgment as to defendant Ed Sampson and permitting him to answer. Respondent moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the order is not appealable. We recently sustained a motion to dismiss an appeal from such an order. Adamson v. Petersen, 68 S. D. 509, 4 N. W.2d 808.
The contention is made that if appellant cannot appeal as a matter of right, this court may within its discretion allow the appeal and appellant has now applied for such an allowance. SDC 33.0701 enumerates the orders which are appealable and in determining whether an appeal either as a matter of right or by leave of this court will lie from an order reference must be had to such statutory pro-visions. The question is one of appellate jurisdiction; in other words, if an order is not appealable, it is not within the jurisdiction of this court to entertain a petition for allowance and to determine the questions involved without awaiting the final determination of the action.
The appeal is therefore dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
27 N.W.2d 245, 71 S.D. 540, 1947 S.D. LEXIS 38, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schmuck-v-dakota-southern-railway-co-sd-1947.