Schmolzer v. Columbus (City)

2 Ohio Law. Abs. 329
Ohio Court of Appeals·Decided February 28, 1924·No. No. 1083·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

KUNKLE, J.

Epitomized Opinion

Published Only in Ohio Law Abstract

This is an action by Schmolzer to recover from the City of Columbus damages for a tort alleged to have been committed by one of the police officers. In affirming the judgment denying a recovery, the Court of Appeals held:

1. The determination of this case is controlled by the decision of the Supreme Court in the Aldrich case, 106 OS. 348. The municipality is not liable -for injuries growing out of [330]*330the exercise by the municipality of its governmental power, and there is no distinction between a case where the municipality acts under a statute and a case where it acts under its charter as in the instant case.

Attorneys — Hogan, Hogan & Hogan, for Schmolzer; C. A. Leach and C. F. Laylin, for Columbus, all of Columbus.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schmolzer v. Columbus (City), 2 Ohio Law. Abs. 329 (Ohio Ct. App. 1924).

2 Ohio Law. Abs. 329 (Schmolzer v. Columbus (City)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. City of Washington Court House
124 N.E.2d 794 (Fayette County Court of Common Pleas, 1955)