Schmitz v. Schmitz
This text of 57 A.2d 51 (Schmitz v. Schmitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this case the respondent filed a petition for divorce on the ground of desertion. The defendant, the appellant, counter-claimed for divorce on the ground of extreme cruelty. The learned advisory master dismissed the petition and counter-claim, and the appeal is from the dismissal of the counter-claim.
We have made a careful examination of the record and briefs of counsel, and we are satisfied that the decree entered in the Court of Chancery should be affirmed.
The decree is affirmed, with costs.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Bodine, Donges, Het-iee, Colie, Wacheneeld, Eastwood, Burling, Wells, Freund, McLean, Sohetttno, JJ. 12.
For reversal — Dill, J. 1.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
57 A.2d 51, 141 N.J. Eq. 272, 1948 N.J. LEXIS 619, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schmitz-v-schmitz-nj-1948.