Schmitt v. Yuhazy

84 Pa. Super. 76, 1924 Pa. Super. LEXIS 218
CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedOctober 15, 1924
DocketAppeal, 25
StatusPublished

This text of 84 Pa. Super. 76 (Schmitt v. Yuhazy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schmitt v. Yuhazy, 84 Pa. Super. 76, 1924 Pa. Super. LEXIS 218 (Pa. Ct. App. 1924).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Appellant complains of the refusal to open and stay an execution on a judgment that was entered pursuant to authority contained in a lease. We have considered the record in the light of the argument made on behalf of appellant and find the conclusion of the court below fully warranted.

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
84 Pa. Super. 76, 1924 Pa. Super. LEXIS 218, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schmitt-v-yuhazy-pasuperct-1924.