Schmitt v. Yuhazy
84 Pa. Super. 76, 1924 Pa. Super. LEXIS 218
Opinion
Appellant complains of the refusal to open and stay an execution on a judgment that was entered pursuant to authority contained in a lease. We have considered the record in the light of the argument made on behalf of appellant and find the conclusion of the court below fully warranted.
The appeal is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Schmitt v. Yuhazy, 84 Pa. Super. 76, 1924 Pa. Super. LEXIS 218 (Pa. Ct. App. 1924).
84 Pa. Super. 76 (Schmitt v. Yuhazy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.