Schmitt v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Schmitt v. State

352 S.W.3d 421, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1498, 2011 WL 5375033

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 8, 2011·No. No. ED 96059·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Christopher R. Schmitt, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed [422] facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Christopher R. Schmitt, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed [422] facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Schmitt v. State, 352 S.W.3d 421, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1498, 2011 WL 5375033 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

352 S.W.3d 421 (Schmitt v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.