Schmitt v. Ryan
242 A.D. 851
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1934·Published
Opinion
Order denying petitioner’s motion for a peremptory or alternative mandamus order reinstating him to the position of inspector of masonry and carpentry in the bureau of construction and maintenance of the board of education unanimously affirmed, with costs, as a matter of law and not in the exercise of discretion. (Matter of Clancy v. Halleran, 263 N. Y. 258.) Present —- Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Cars-well, Tompkins and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Schmitt v. Ryan, 242 A.D. 851 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).
242 A.D. 851 (Schmitt v. Ryan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Matter of Clancy v. Halleran
188 N.E. 746 (New York Court of Appeals, 1934)