Schmitt v. Ryan
This text of 242 A.D. 851 (Schmitt v. Ryan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order denying petitioner’s motion for a peremptory or alternative mandamus order reinstating him to the position of inspector of masonry and carpentry in the bureau of construction and maintenance of the board of education unanimously affirmed, with costs, as a matter of law and not in the exercise of discretion. (Matter of Clancy v. Halleran, 263 N. Y. 258.) Present —- Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Cars-well, Tompkins and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
242 A.D. 851, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schmitt-v-ryan-nyappdiv-1934.