Schmitt v. Reed

9 N.Y.S. 705, 1890 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 334
The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo·Decided May 5, 1890·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The j udgment should be affirmed, with costs, upon the opinion filed by the learned judge at special term.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schmitt v. Reed, 9 N.Y.S. 705, 1890 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 334 (superctny 1890).

9 N.Y.S. 705 (Schmitt v. Reed) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Zorn v. McParland
59 N.Y. St. Rep. 521 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1894)
Zorn v. McFarland
28 N.Y.S. 485 (Superior Court of New York, 1894)