Schmitt v. Reed

31 N.Y. St. Rep. 395
CourtThe Superior Court of New York City
DecidedMay 5, 1890
StatusPublished

This text of 31 N.Y. St. Rep. 395 (Schmitt v. Reed) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schmitt v. Reed, 31 N.Y. St. Rep. 395 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1890).

Opinion

Per Ouriam.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs, upon the opinion filed by the learned judge at special term.

Sedgwick, Oh. J., and Freedman, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
31 N.Y. St. Rep. 395, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schmitt-v-reed-nysuperctnyc-1890.