Schmitt v. Perales

187 A.D.2d 1041, 593 N.Y.S.2d 486, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14148
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 18, 1992·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Petition unanimously dismissed without costs. Memorandum: Pursuant to CPLR 7804 (g), we consider respondents’ contention that the petition should be dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction (see, Matter of Desmone v Blum, 99 AD2d 170; 8 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac ¶ 7804.09). Be[1042] cause the notice of petition failed to set forth the time and place of the scheduled hearing on the petition, personal jurisdiction was not acquired over respondents and the petition should have been dismissed (see, Travis v New York State Dept. of Envtl. Conservation, 185 AD2d 714; Matter of RECYCLE v Lacatena, 163 AD2d 693, 694). (Article 78 Proceeding Transferred by Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Mintz, J.) Present — Boomer, J. P., Pine, Lawton, Boehm and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schmitt v. Perales, 187 A.D.2d 1041, 593 N.Y.S.2d 486, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14148 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

187 A.D.2d 1041 (Schmitt v. Perales) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hunter's Crossing Neighborhood Ass'n v. Maul
267 A.D.2d 1036 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Francis v. Goord
266 A.D.2d 845 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)