Schmitt v. INNOVATIVE LAWN SYSTEMS, INC.

739 N.W.2d 159, 2007 Minn. LEXIS 614, 2007 WL 2874943
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedSeptember 26, 2007
DocketA07-1212
StatusPublished

This text of 739 N.W.2d 159 (Schmitt v. INNOVATIVE LAWN SYSTEMS, INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schmitt v. INNOVATIVE LAWN SYSTEMS, INC., 739 N.W.2d 159, 2007 Minn. LEXIS 614, 2007 WL 2874943 (Mich. 2007).

Opinion

*160 ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed May 24, 2007, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that “[sjummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

BY THE COURT:

/s/Helen M. Meyer Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hoff v. Kempton
317 N.W.2d 361 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
739 N.W.2d 159, 2007 Minn. LEXIS 614, 2007 WL 2874943, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schmitt-v-innovative-lawn-systems-inc-minn-2007.