Schmitt v. House of St. Giles the Cripple
This text of 283 A.D. 972 (Schmitt v. House of St. Giles the Cripple) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action by the infant plaintiff to recover damages for personal injuries sustained in a fall while a patient in defendant hospital, and by her father for medical expenses, defendant appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered on the verdict of a jury. The accident occurred while the infant, on crutches for the first or second time after having been in bed for three weeks with her leg in traction, and complaining of dizziness, was left unattended by a nurse who went out of the room to answer the telephone. The trial court charged, without exception, that it was “the duty of the defendant hospital to use reasonable care for the protection of the plaintiff from injuries due to negligence in the administration and operation of the hospital not directly concerned with medical treatment.” Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Under the court’s charge, the jury could find from the evidence that the nurse’s act in leaving the infant plaintiff without supervision was an administrative act which was the proximate cause of her injuries. (Cf. Santos v. Unity Hosp., 301 N. Y. 153; Iacono V. New York Polyclinic Med. School & Hosp., 296 N. Y. 502; Corten v. Harbor Hosp., 279 App. Div. 673, and Poplar v. Bourjois, Inc., 298 N. Y. 62, 67-68.) Present — Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Schmidt, Beldock and Murphy, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
283 A.D. 972, 130 N.Y.S.2d 613, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5960, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schmitt-v-house-of-st-giles-the-cripple-nyappdiv-1954.