Schmitt v. Continental-Diamond Fibre Co.
This text of 1 F.R.D. 109 (Schmitt v. Continental-Diamond Fibre Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This matter came on to be heard on the motion of the defendant to retax costs.
The question is as to whether or not the cost and expense of the taking of the deposition of the plaintiff by the defendant should be taxed as costs against the plaintiff, the losing party, and in favor of the defendant.
The rules permit the taking of the deposition and its taking can be said to have been reasonably necessary, — in fact, the court is of the opinion that to have failed to take the deposition would have been negligence. The costs of the taking of the deposition should be taxed against the plaintiff.
An appropriate order may be made at the opening of court on Monday, January 29, 1940, without any other or further notice than this.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 F.R.D. 109, 1940 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1856, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schmitt-v-continental-diamond-fibre-co-ilnd-1940.