Schmitt v. Continental-Diamond Fibre Co.

1 F.R.D. 109, 1940 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1856
CourtDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois
DecidedJanuary 25, 1940
DocketNo. 41394
StatusPublished

This text of 1 F.R.D. 109 (Schmitt v. Continental-Diamond Fibre Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schmitt v. Continental-Diamond Fibre Co., 1 F.R.D. 109, 1940 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1856 (N.D. Ill. 1940).

Opinion

BARNES, District Judge.

This matter came on to be heard on the motion of the defendant to retax costs.

The question is as to whether or not the cost and expense of the taking of the deposition of the plaintiff by the defendant should be taxed as costs against the plaintiff, the losing party, and in favor of the defendant.

The rules permit the taking of the deposition and its taking can be said to have been reasonably necessary, — in fact, the court is of the opinion that to have failed to take the deposition would have been negligence. The costs of the taking of the deposition should be taxed against the plaintiff.

An appropriate order may be made at the opening of court on Monday, January 29, 1940, without any other or further notice than this.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 F.R.D. 109, 1940 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1856, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schmitt-v-continental-diamond-fibre-co-ilnd-1940.