Schmitt-Doss v. American Regent, Inc.

Fourth Circuit

Schmitt-Doss v. American Regent, Inc.

599 F. App'x 71

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 1, 2015·No. No. 14-1891·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Nancy A. Schmitt-Doss appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendants on her complaint seeking damages for personal injuries under Virginia tort law. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Schmitt-Doss v. Am. Regent, Inc., No. 6:12-cv-00040-NKM-RSB, 2014 WL 3853184 (W.D.Va. Aug. 5, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because- the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Nancy A. Schmitt-Doss appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendants on her complaint seeking damages for personal injuries under Virginia tort law. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Schmitt-Doss v. Am. Regent, Inc., No. 6:12-cv-00040-NKM-RSB, 2014 WL 3853184 (W.D.Va. Aug. 5, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because- the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Schmitt-Doss v. American Regent, Inc., 599 F. App'x 71 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

599 F. App'x 71 (Schmitt-Doss v. American Regent, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related