Schmirler v. Kappos
This text of Schmirler v. Kappos (Schmirler v. Kappos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
DENNIS L. SCHMIRLER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
DAVID J. KAPPOS, UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR, UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Defendant-Appellee. ____________________
2012-1078 ______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin in No. 10-CV-0144, Judge Lynn Adelman. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
GARET K. GALSTER, Ryan Kromholz & Manion, S.C., of Milwaukee, Wisconsin, argued for plaintiff-appellant.
THOMAS W. KRAUSE, Associate Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were RAYMOND T. CHEN, Solicitor, and FRANCES M. LYNCH, Associate Solicitor. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (RADER, Chief Judge, PROST and REYNA, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
September 6, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Schmirler v. Kappos, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schmirler-v-kappos-cafc-2012.