Schmidt v. Yoakum

California Court of Appeal

Schmidt v. Yoakum

39 Cal. App. 790

California Court of Appeal·Decided December 9, 1918·No. Civ. No. 2596; Civ. No. 2597·Published

Opinion

CONREY, P. J.

In each of these eases the plaintiff appeals from an order granting a motion for a new trial. The only questions presented for determination are included among those considered by this court in Schmidt v. Santa Monica Commercial Co., ante, p. 785, [178 Pac. 315], in which the decision of the court has been this day filed. [1] On the authority of that decision, the orders granting the motions for new trial in the above-entitled actions numbered 2596 and 2597 are and each of them is affirmed.

James, J., and Myers, J., pro tern., concurred.

[791] A petition to have the causes heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on February 6, 1919.

All the Justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CONREY, P. J.

In each of these eases the plaintiff appeals from an order granting a motion for a new trial. The only questions presented for determination are included among those considered by this court in Schmidt v. Santa Monica Commercial Co., ante, p. 785, [178 Pac. 315], in which the decision of the court has been this day filed. [1] On the authority of that decision, the orders granting the motions for new trial in the above-entitled actions numbered 2596 and 2597 are and each of them is affirmed.

James, J., and Myers, J., pro tern., concurred.

[791] A petition to have the causes heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on February 6, 1919.

All the Justices concurred.

Schmidt v. Yoakum, 39 Cal. App. 790 (Cal. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

39 Cal. App. 790 (Schmidt v. Yoakum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related