Schmidt v. Warwick Public School District 29
Opinion
Filed 12/2/10 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2010 ND 228
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Randall Dale Duffy, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20100126
Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Sonna M. Anderson, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Lloyd C. Suhr, Assistant State’s Attorney, Courthouse, 514 E. Thayer Ave., Bismarck, N.D. 58501, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.
Jay R. Greenwood, North Dakota Public Defenders’ Office, 135 Sims, Ste. 221, Dickinson, N.D. 58601, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.
State v. Duffy
No. 20100126
Per Curiam.
[¶1] Randall Duffy appeals from a criminal judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of assault. On appeal, Duffy argues insufficient evidence exists to support the guilty verdict. We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Mary Muehlen Maring
Daniel J. Crothers
Dale V. Sandstrom
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2010 ND 225 (Schmidt v. Warwick Public School District 29) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.